SEXO: ¿POCO AHORA O MUCHO DESPUÉS?
DIFERENCIAS EN PATRONES DE IMPULSIVIDAD Y AUTOCONTROL ENTRE INDIVIDUOS SOLTEROS Y COMPROMETIDOS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35919/rbsh.v35.1144Palabras clave:
descuento por demora, satisfacción sexual, sexo, relaciones, soltero, comportamiento sexualResumen
Objetivo: Investigar si existe un patrón de comportamiento de elección más impulsivo o autocontrolado entre individuos en relaciones comparado con aquellos que están solteros, utilizando el descuento del retraso con escenarios sexuales hipotéticos. Método: Se trata de un estudio empírico, cuantitativo, realizado con 51 participantes, hombres y mujeres cisgénero, mayores de 18 años y universitarios que estuvieran en relaciones o solteros. Resultados: Las personas en relaciones y las personas solteras descontaban de manera similar (U = 269, z = -1.038, p = 0.29), pero más personas en relaciones demostraron una mayor satisfacción sexual. Estos resultados se obtuvieron mediante los siguientes instrumentos: QSRS y una Tarea de Descuento del Retraso de actividades sexuales hipotéticas. Comprender cómo las personas en relaciones y las personas solteras toman decisiones sexuales contribuye a abordar problemas de salud asociados con el comportamiento sexual. Conclusiones: Existe una tendencia hacia una mayor impulsividad sexual en las personas en relaciones, con factores que pueden influir en esta dinámica y una asociación positiva entre el estado de relación y el contentamiento sexual.
Descargas
Citas
AINSLIE, G. Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. Psychological Bulletin, v. 82, n. 4, p. 463–496, 1975. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076860. Acesso em: 17 nov. 2023.
BEAUCHAINE, T. P.; BEN-DAVID, I.; SELA, A. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, delay discounting, and risky financial behaviors: A preliminary analysis of self-report data. PLoS ONE, 2017. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176933. Acesso em: 17 nov. 2023.
BICKELl, W. K.; ODUM, A. L.; MADDEN, G. J. Impulsivity and cigarette smoking: Delay discounting in current, never, and ex-smokers. Psychopharmacology, v. 146, n. 4, p. 447-454, 1999. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/pl00005490. Acesso em: 17 nov. 2023.
CHESSON, H. W.; LEICHLITER, J. S.; ZIMET, G. D.; ROSENTHAL, S. L.; BERNSTEIN, D. I.; FIFE, K. H. Discount rates and risky sexual behaviors among teenagers and young adults. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, v. 32, n. 3, p. 217–230, 2006. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-006-9520-1. Acesso em: 17 nov. 2023.
COELHO, C.; HANNA, E. S.; TODOROV, J. C. Magnitude, delay, and probability of reinforcer in hypothetical risk situations. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, v. 19, n. 3, p. 269-278, 2003. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-37722003000300009. Acesso em: 17 nov. 2023.
FIELD, A. Discovering statistics using SPSS. 3 ed. London: Sage Publications Ltd., 2009. Acesso em: 17 nov. 2023.
FREDERICK, S.; LOEWENSTEIN, G.; O’DONOGHUE, T. Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. In: LOEWENSTEIN, R.; READ, D.; BAUMEISTER, R. F. (Orgs.). Time and Decision, p. 13–86, 2003. doi: https://doi.org/10.1257/002205102320161311. Acesso em: 17 nov. 2023.
HAHN, H.; KALNITSKY, S.; HAINES, N.; THAMOTHARAN, S.; BEAUCHAINE, TP.; Ahn WY. Delay Discounting of Protected Sex: Relationship Type and Sexual Orientation Influence Sexual Risk Behavior. Arch Sex Behav. Erratum in: Arch Sex Behav, 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-1450-5. Acesso em: 17 nov. 2023.
HANNA, E. S.; RIBEIRO, M. R. Self-control: A special case of choice behavior. RODRIGUES, A.; RIBEIRO, M. R.; RIBEIRO (Orgs.). Análise do Comportamento: Pesquisa, Teoria e Aplicação, p.175-187. São Paulo: ARTMED, 2005. doi: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242012340. Acesso em: 17 nov. 2023.
JOHNSON, M. W.; BRUNER, N. R. The sexual discounting task: HIV risk behavior and the discounting of delayed sexual rewards in cocaine dependence. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, v. 123, n. 1–3, p. 15–22, 2012. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.09.032. Acesso em: 17 nov. 2023.
JONES, B.; RACHLIN, H. Social discounting. Psychological Science, v. 17, n. 4, p. 283–286, 2006. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01699. Acesso em: 17 nov. 2023.
JONES, J.; GUEST, J. L.; SULLIVAN, P. S.; SALES, J. M.; JENNESS, S. M.; KRAMER, M. R. The association between monetary and sexual delay discounting and risky sexual behavior in an online sample of men who have sex with men. AIDS Care, v. 30, n. 7, p. 844–852, 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2018.1427851. Acesso em: 17 nov. 2023.
LAWYER, S. R. Probability and delay discounting of erotic stimuli. Behavioural Processes, v. 79, n. 1, p. 36-42, 2008. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2008.04.009. Acesso em: 17 nov. 2023.
LAWYER, S. R.; MAHONEY, C. T. Delay discounting and probability discounting, but not response inhibition, are associated with sexual risk taking in adults. Journal of Sex Research, v. 55, n. 7, p. 863–870, 2017. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2017.1350627. Acesso em: 17 nov. 2023.
LAWYER, S. R.; SCHOEPFLIN, F. J. Predicting domain-specific outcomes using delay and probability discounting for sexual versus monetary outcomes. Behavioural Processes, 96, p. 71–78, 2013. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2013.03.001. Acesso em: 17 nov. 2023.
LAWYER, S. R.; WILLIAMS, S. A.; PRIHODOVA, T.; ROLLIN, J. D.; LESTER, A. C. Probability and delay discounting of hypothetical sexual outcomes. Behavioural Processes, 2010. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2010.04.002. Acesso em: 17 nov. 2023.
MAHONEY, C. T.; LAWYER, S. R. Domain-specific relationships in sexual measures of impulsive behavior. Archives of Sexual Behavior, v. 47, n. 6, p. 1591–1599, 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1210-y. Acesso em: 17 nov. 2023.
MAZUR, J. E. An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. In: The effect of delay and of intervening events on reinforcement value. Psychology Press., p. 55-73, 2013. Acesso em: 17 nov. 2023.
ODUM, A. L. et al. Delay discounting of different outcomes: Review and theory. Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, v. 113, n. 3, p. 657-679, 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.589. Acesso em: 17 nov. 2023.
RACHLIN, H.; RAINERI, A.; CRUZ, D. Subjective probability and delay. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, v. 55, p. 233–244, 1991. doi: https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1991.55-233. Acesso em: 17 nov. 2023.
RASMUSSEN, E. B.; LAWYER, S. R.; REILLY, W. Percent body fat is related to delay and probability discounting for food in humans. Behavioural Processes, v. 83, n. 1, p. 23–30, 2010. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2009.09.001. Acesso em: 17 nov. 2023.
RIBEIRO, J. P.; RAIMUNDO, A. Estudo de adaptação do questionário de satisfação com o relacionamento sexual (QSRS) em mulheres com incontinência urinária. Psicologia, Saúde e Doenças, v. 6, n. 2, p. 191-202, 2005. Disponível em: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/362/36260207.pdf. Acesso em: 17 nov. 2023.
SAMPAIO, A. A. S. Skinner: Sobre ciência e comportamento humano. Psicologia: Ciência e Profissão, 25, p. 370-383, 2005. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1414-98932005000300004. Acesso em: 17 nov. 2023.
SKINNER, B. F. Science and human behavior. New York/London: Free Press/Collier MacMillan,1965. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012370509-9.00087-5. Acesso em: 17 nov. 2023.
THAMOTHARAN, S.; HAHN, H.; FIELDS, S. Drug use status in youth: The role of gender and delay discounting. Substance Use and Misuse, v. 103, n. 3, p. 1–10, 2017. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2017.1280831. Acesso em: 17 nov. 2023
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Bárbara Dias Oliveira de Souza, Paulo Roberto Cavalcanti
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
